JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 9, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Jorge Augusto Escobar Porras

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó parcialmente la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación no encontró un cuestionamiento claro contra la providencia recurrida y, por ello, decidió CONFIRMARLA en su integridad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la providencia proferida el 13 de agosto de 2020 por la magistrada Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, en cuanto rechazo el cargo por vulneracion del principio de legalidad en materia penal, presentado por el ciudadano Jorge Augusto Escobar Porras contra algunas expresiones contenidas en los articulos 210 y 211, numeral 7, del Codigo Penal.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por intermedio de la Secretaria General, COMUNIQUESE el contenido de esta decision a la demandante, advirtiendo que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
  3. Una vez quede ejecutoriado el presente auto, ARCHIVESE el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceLuis Javier Moreno Ortiz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.